I always thought of a PhD as a logical next step after graduating but was never sure of the exact field I wanted to enter into, however, I wanted to remain within the broad area of Bioengineering. Choosing this program meant I would have a year of taught courses to give an overview of Medical Devices, and being given a list of projects to choose from enabled a conscious and more informed decision.

Working towards gaining a PhD, so no further qualifications gained yet. My project is focused on microfluidics for neuroscience so I am gaining some very interdisciplinary skills and knowledge.

I have another 2 years of full time research after this one, but am still not completely sure of where I will end up. I am currently keeping my options open but definitely find working in industry more appealing than remaining in academia. I have been enjoying my area of study so far so can see myself remaining either in the area of microfluidics or neuroscience, or even both! However, I have also thought about areas such as medical device regulatory affairs and clinical research.

A PhD is definitely a commitment and so they should think about their options and speak to those who have followed this path. I would also say by choosing a Centre for Doctoral Training, you are given more time before having to choose a project and also gain some interesting knowledge and insights into the general area of the program. The taught component can also help to determine the area you find most interesting and appealing. Finally, an EngD program has greater links to industry and so if this is something that is appealing, it is worth looking into over the traditional PhD.